Women (and Men) in Finance Are Not « Typical »
In contrast to common beliefs, women in finance may be less risk-averse than men in finance. This “atypical” gender difference can occur because of the choices that lead women and men to end up in finance. Using data on directors of financial and non-financial firms and members of the general population, I document that individual attributes like risk aversion can vary widely within groups of people. I also show that distributions of preferences can change once they are conditioned on choices. Formulating policies using assumptions about unconditional “typical” attributes can be misleading and lead to ecological fallacies like the “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis.